Logo remediation technology
October 14 - 16, 2025
The Westin
Westminster, CO
Conveniently Located between Boulder & Denver
search
linkedin youtube
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
October 14 - 16, 2025
The Westin
Westminster, CO
Conveniently Located between Boulder & Denver
Logo remediation technology
  • HOME
  • SUBMIT ABSTRACT
  • REGISTER
    • Registration Fees
    • Register Now!
  • ATTEND
    • Agenda
    • Why Attend The Summit
    • Attended Companies
    • 2024 Photo Gallery
  • PRESENTERS
    • Scientific Advisory Board
    • Keynotes/Session Chairs
    • Platform Presenters
    • Poster Presenters
    • Student Presenters
  • SPONSOR/EXHIBIT
    • Become a Sponsor or Exhibitor
    • Exhibit Floor Plan
    • Event Logos & Ads
  • STUDENTS
    • Student Program
    • Past Student Winners
  • TRAVEL
  • NEWSLETTERS
  • CONTACT
    • Stay Connected
    • Show Staff
Environmental Remediation NewsTestingCompoundsEmerging ContaminantsPFASVOCs

More than 100 scientists rejects WHO's draft PFAS guidelines

"WHO’s draft guidelines toss established science out the window in favor of a random technology-based approach," says one signatory.

PFAS drinking water

Photo by manu schwendener on Unsplash

November 17, 2022

More than 100 scientists sent a letter to the World Health Organization today urging a complete overhaul or withdrawal of the organization’s draft drinking water guidelines for the two most well-studied per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). The letter details how WHO’s draft eschews calculating health-based standards, disregarding robust evidence for the harms of PFOS and PFOA. The letter also notes the lack of transparency about the draft’s authorship.

“WHO’s draft guidelines toss established science out the window in favor of a random technology-based approach,” said Arlene Blum, a signatory and executive director of the Green Science Policy Institute. “As a result, the guidelines fall far short of what is necessary to protect our drinking water and health from PFAS.”

The scientists illustrate how the draft’s survey of scientific studies omits or obscures evidence of the links between PFOS and PFOA exposure and cancer, liver damage, increased cholesterol, and immune system harms, among others. For these outcomes, there are numerous strong human studies finding links with very low levels of exposure to these two and to other PFAS. These links are further supported by numerous animal and mechanistic studies.

Because WHO’s draft ignores the large body of human and animal health studies to focus on remediation technology capabilities and costs, its proposed guidelines are a significant departure from the science-based guidelines derived by other major health agencies. For example, the U.S. EPA, California EPA, and the U.S. EPA Science Advisory Board’s PFAS Review Panel all agree that evidence from animal and human studies (including within the general population) supports development of a drinking water guideline for PFOA based on cancer risk.

The scientists also note that WHO did not disclose the names, affiliations, and potential conflicts-of-interest of those involved in the preparation or peer-review of the draft guidelines.

“It’s concerning that we don’t know who wrote the WHO draft,” said Linda Birnbaum, a signatory and scientist emeritus and former director of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and the National Toxicology Program. “As an authoritative body, WHO should show a high degree of transparency and objectivity. They should therefore identify the names, affiliations, and potential conflict-of-interest of authors and reviewers of this draft and any future WHO documents.”

Source: Green Science Policy Institute
KEYWORDS: contaminated water PFOS

Share This Story

Post a comment to this article

Report Abusive Comment

Subscribe For Free!
  • eNewsletter
  • Online Registration
  • Manage My Preferences
  • Customer Service

More Videos

Related Articles

  • EPA

    EPA Scientists Who Sounded Alarm During Trump Admin Faced Retaliation

    See More
  • DOD water

    More than 600,000 service members given drinking water with forever chemicals

    See More
  • The northwest corner of the Monticello Disposal Cell

    Long term remediation is more than meets the eye

    See More
×

Get our eNewsletter delivered to your inbox!

Stay in the know on the latest environmental sciences & remediation news and information.

SUBSCRIBE TODAY

BNP Events

Privacy Policy | Code of Conduct

Copyright ©2025. All Rights Reserved
Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing